A Moral Scenario

bendk

Grimscribe
9d252188-0753-45f9-b54b-b978c02b1b67-baby_David2.jpg



I read a local article that has preyed on my mind recently. I was wondering what TLOers thought of this story. (I'll voice my opinion later).

Baby David Detwiler gets good news; kidney transplant approved

His parents discovered before his birth that their fourth child had no functioning kidney. They were told to terminate the pregnancy or carry the baby to term to potentially get a few minutes before he died because he would not have fully developed lungs to breathe. David survived birth and has undergone 12 hours of peritoneal dialysis at home each night, with the goal of a kidney transplant.
But there have been many struggles for David, who is named after a saying the Detwilers believe is powerful: “If God puts a Goliath in front of you, there must be a David inside of you.”
Last Thanksgiving, the family shared that David is blind in both eyes and has cerebral palsy.
Early Wednesday morning, he had a major seizure at home and had to be rushed to the hospital, where he had several more seizures. Doctors are unsure what caused these.
“This poor guy has spent every Thanksgiving at the hospital,” his mother said. David is being evaluated at the hospital, and while he’s extremely exhausted from the seizures, has shown his little personality by saying ”hi” and “thank you” to nurses, Carlla said.
Although he has been approved for an organ transplant, he is still a very high-risk kidney transplant patient. Patients with poorly formed lungs are at risk of lung issues that can lead to heart issues, heart failure, or death, the doctor said.
“In the first nine months after a kidney transplant, the patient is at higher risk of dying than on dialysis," he said. "They're having a major operation. They're having another organ sewed into their body. They're getting huge doses of immunosuppression, which sets them up to be at high risk for fungal infections, bacterial infections, and viral infections, and then they embark on lifelong immunosuppression. The immunosuppression has side effects.”
David is a toddler now. Though he is not physically or cognitively up to par with other toddlers, he is reaching his own milestones. For instance, he just rolled over on his own, which was a huge accomplishment, Carlla said.
“This amazing miracle has shown us his strength, fight, and determination since his very first breath,” his mother, Carlla Detwiler said. “He’s amazing and I am thankful for every single day that we have with him. He has taught me more in these last two and a half years than I have ever learned in my life."

Well, that's all that matters...
 
Many people have no purpose in life so they create suffering to make their lives more 'real'. I think you also cannot rule out Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome though in this case they don't have to fake illnesses. I believe in the future we'll see more cases of children being born with severe defects survived by choice of parents. The WASP Mom, the Silicon Valley elite, anti-vaxxers, born-again Christians...etc..these groups converge to highlight every suffering as the chance to unite our humanity and prove that 'miracles' exist. As long as they can bring in donations, it's all possible.
 
This story brings to mind this pretty remarkable recent case that I've only just learned of:


Para-showjumper who sued mother's GP claiming she 'should never have been born' wins landmark case | Daily Mail Online


In any case, if I believe anything at all these days, it's this:

There is no moral justification for putting an innocent person into a situation where not only is suffering guaranteed but the potential for suffering is practically limitless, when that person has absolutely no say in the matter. This is true whether a child is born "perfectly healthy" or dies after a few hours of intense anguish.
 
I think you also cannot rule out Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome though in this case they don't have to fake illnesses. I believe in the future we'll see more cases of children being born with severe defects survived by choice of parents. The WASP Mom, the Silicon Valley elite, anti-vaxxers, born-again Christians...etc..these groups converge to highlight every suffering as the chance to unite our humanity and prove that 'miracles' exist. As long as they can bring in donations, it's all possible.

I do believe that the cause of this suffering is the belief in Christianity and their belittlement of pain.


This story brings to mind this pretty remarkable recent case that I've only just learned of:


Para-showjumper who sued mother's GP claiming she 'should never have been born' wins landmark case | Daily Mail Online


It is nice to see, but, unfortunately, I doubt if anything will come from this.

A successful fraud case against organized religion has yet to be won, which I find remarkable.

In any case, if I believe anything at all these days, it's this:

There is no moral justification for putting an innocent person into a situation where not only is suffering guaranteed but the potential for suffering is practically limitless, when that person has absolutely no say in the matter. This is true whether a child is born "perfectly healthy" or dies after a few hours of intense anguish.

Agreed.


Ref. the OP, I think it is inexcusable that someone is allowed to be tortured for another person's delusions. Eventually, society needs to send that message. Both parents should be forcibly sterilized. Then they need to be provided a profound education in suffering. Not vicarious, as Christians have, admittedly, already proven their fortitude when confronted with the suffering of others.
 
Back
Top