Hi
I haven’t posted here before. I have just read ‘The Conspiracy Against The Human Race’. This work surprised me, as I haven’t before read (and never expected to read) literature that discusses at length the experience of being miserable and struggling with existence. As is discussed it is not a popular or encouraged philosophy. I personally have found that any mention of it prompts questions about ones sanity, rationality and intelligence.
I have never before found an in depth exploration of all of the relevant philosophy, literature, questions and struggles faced by a person who dislikes life.
I have encountered many of the philosophies myself and asked the same questions as I have contemplated existence and struggled with depression. As I have frantically searched for meaning and an ending to the suffering but suppose I didn’t know other people had trodden the same path, asked the same questions, read the same literature. So it was interesting to read this, Thanks.
One other person I have encountered who I thought could be relevant is
J. Krishnamurti. UG Krishnamurti denounced him, as he did everyone. Like UG he recognised that we live a hellish existence, fuelled and tortured by desire and tormented by loneliness, isolation and anxiety. He said that this was the reality of life and that ability to see this demonstrated a sensitivity that the people who enjoyed life lacked. Where he differs is that he offers a kind of hope. Similar to Buddhism but whereas Buddhists give a method of escape for you to carry out, he says that there is no method and nothing that you can physically do. He says that there is no escape in the positive, active sense but that there might be one in the act of passive negation. In the action of just being aware of the prison of our consciousness. Not doing anything to it, attempting to change and interfering but just watching it operate. Uncovering our hidden desires and learning about the way our thinking works. He said that examination and scrutiny would reveal the falseness of our thinking. Although he said that we shouldn’t want to rid of it no matter how difficult and repulsive our lives are but that we should examine it unbiased. And that when we find it impossible to be aware of ourselves without wanting to change that we should then turn our focus to that. To our inability to look at anything objectively. To the fact that whatever we see we want to change. For example when we become aware that we are sad, we recognise and name it as sadness, instantly tainting it as something negative and so comes the desire to want to get rid of it.
I haven’t posted here before. I have just read ‘The Conspiracy Against The Human Race’. This work surprised me, as I haven’t before read (and never expected to read) literature that discusses at length the experience of being miserable and struggling with existence. As is discussed it is not a popular or encouraged philosophy. I personally have found that any mention of it prompts questions about ones sanity, rationality and intelligence.
I have never before found an in depth exploration of all of the relevant philosophy, literature, questions and struggles faced by a person who dislikes life.
I have encountered many of the philosophies myself and asked the same questions as I have contemplated existence and struggled with depression. As I have frantically searched for meaning and an ending to the suffering but suppose I didn’t know other people had trodden the same path, asked the same questions, read the same literature. So it was interesting to read this, Thanks.
One other person I have encountered who I thought could be relevant is
J. Krishnamurti. UG Krishnamurti denounced him, as he did everyone. Like UG he recognised that we live a hellish existence, fuelled and tortured by desire and tormented by loneliness, isolation and anxiety. He said that this was the reality of life and that ability to see this demonstrated a sensitivity that the people who enjoyed life lacked. Where he differs is that he offers a kind of hope. Similar to Buddhism but whereas Buddhists give a method of escape for you to carry out, he says that there is no method and nothing that you can physically do. He says that there is no escape in the positive, active sense but that there might be one in the act of passive negation. In the action of just being aware of the prison of our consciousness. Not doing anything to it, attempting to change and interfering but just watching it operate. Uncovering our hidden desires and learning about the way our thinking works. He said that examination and scrutiny would reveal the falseness of our thinking. Although he said that we shouldn’t want to rid of it no matter how difficult and repulsive our lives are but that we should examine it unbiased. And that when we find it impossible to be aware of ourselves without wanting to change that we should then turn our focus to that. To our inability to look at anything objectively. To the fact that whatever we see we want to change. For example when we become aware that we are sad, we recognise and name it as sadness, instantly tainting it as something negative and so comes the desire to want to get rid of it.