Yes, it doesn't really capture the mood of the book.Upon reflection, I think Robin Davies has a good point.
Its just that I envisioned Vermillion Sands as near future science fiction, while the book's cover art struck me as more far future, even the setting seems un-earthly.
And that, kids, is how AIDS started.
Not only is this literalist, but it's wrong. The Turn of the Bolt?
It's a while since I read it but I think the novel is sword-and-sorcery with nary a spaceship in sight! Bruce Pennington did a much better cover.
While I haven't read The Confessions of Zeno, I'm sure it's not about a hairdressing competition.
![]()
This might be an ironic move on the publisher's part: there's no hero in our time, just wannabe hipster acting tough.![]()
I worry about the person who approved this cover.
I did not read Tarzan and I do not know if it is any good, but it is indeed a classic.
Posting covers of illiterate pulp and self-published novels is just picking low-hanging fruit, so I thought it would be interesting to make a thread dedicated to bad covers of "great" books.
This eldritch abomination is a slight collection of Poe stories and poems intended for secondary education students. The annotations are even more abysmal; will post if I can find some of them online as don't possess a copy.
![]()
I did not read Tarzan and I do not know if it is any good, but it is indeed a classic.
Tarzan of the Apes and Tarzan the Terrible, for example, are masterpieces!
E. R. Burroughs's books should not be neglected as mere boys' adventure fiction. He had a great mind, was philosophical. A very fertile, generous artist. Always passionate, never lukewarm, giving everything of himself.
The first three Barsoom books contain many glorious moments.
![]()
Tarzan looks like an alcoholic, and the monkey on his back seems half deceased.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.