Some thoughts about
The Dracula Papers:
I'm most likely preaching to the choir here, but Reggie Oliver is always such a pleasure to read. Having collected his works for the last 15+ years, I naturally jumped at the opp to own a hardback version of
The Dracula Papers, which I had previously read a while ago.
Oliver really pulled out all the stops with this one. Gothic grotesque, horror, comedy, salacious escapades - incestuous or otherwise - this book has everything in spades, and is relentless in its delivery. Neither my familiarity with its content, nor the fact that Oliver recycled some of his older works (the Casanova narrative & the episode of the Old Queen come to mind), managed to diminish my enjoyment in any way. It does, however, make me pine so very much for the sequels the author had promised. After all, this is (was?) meant to be volume 1 of 4. I still hope for the day!
The only mark against my reading experience was the edition itself. I can't help but notice the poor proofreading job on
The Dracula Papers. Typos, random punctuations, Random Capitalisation etc. These are rather distracting & most regrettable, for a top-tier publisher of weird fiction like Zagava. I had noticed proofreading issues before in some of their other works (Ineke's
The Lights, for example), but never to this degree. I do not work in the publishing business, yet I can't help but wonder if Zagava's punishing(?) schedule has anything to do with it. After all, 1 major announcement plus other sundries per month does *seem* a lot. I do hope this is the exception rather than the rule for their future works.